Legal Opinion

Mason v. Mallard Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 9, 1932No. 40876PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimm, J.

In June, 1929, the plaintiff-appellants filed an action in equity in the District Court of Palo Alto County, Iowa, asking for a writ of mandamus to require the defendant telephone company to transfer, on its books, certain shares of stock. The defendants answered, alleging, among other things, that the plaintiffs had not complied with Article V of the Articles of Incorporation, requiring new stockholders to be approved by two directors. The court found for the defendants, and the plaintiffs appeal.

It appears from the record in this case that the defendant corporation was a local concern…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New England Trust Co. v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Barrett v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Casper v. Kalt-Zimmers Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Farmers' Mercantile & Supply Co. v. LaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Traer v. Lucas Prospecting Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Card v. StirnweisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Talbott v. NibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. McDonald v. Farley & Loetscher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Rafe v. HindinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Barton Naphtha Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API