Legal Opinion

Sanquirico v. Benedetti

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1847PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Eq/uity. The bill of complaint alleged that the defendant had agreed with the complainant to perform and sing in concerts, operas,

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

Although there may be cases in which a court of equity will decree specific performance of a contract for personal services, still, this is not one of that character. The difficulty, if not the utter impracticability, of compelling a specific performance of the contract set forth in the bill, is a conclusive reason why this court should refuse its interference. The complainant should be left to his remedy at law. If, however, there were any doubt, upon principle, yet, I consider it abundantly settled upon authority, that the complainant can have no relief upon the equity side of the court.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamblin v. DinnefordNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  2. De Rivafinoli v. CorsettiNew York Court of Chancery · 1833

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cort v. LassardOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hahn v. Concordia SocietyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Bronk v. RileyNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. McCaull v. BrahamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
  5. Rosenstein v. ZentzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API