Legal Opinion

Langley v. Stone

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1965No. 41442PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. The answer and cross action set forth a good defense and grounds for cross action. In the absence of evidence conclusively disproving the facts alleged in the answer and cross action the allegations therein must be taken as true. Cotton States Mutual Ins. Co. v. Martin, 110 Ga. App. 309, 310 (138 SE2d 433).

2. Powers of sale must be fairly exercised. Code ■ Ann. §§ 37-607, 37-608. The fact that Code Ann. § 37-608 prohibits an action for a deficiency judgment unless a sale under power is confirmed by the superior court, irrespective of the difference in the value of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Motor Contract Company v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Sullivan v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Gwinnett Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Aetna Finance Co. v. CulpepperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Clark v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Murray v. HastyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Oglethorpe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API