Legal Opinion

McNinch v. Crawford

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1904No. 1,853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Co'urt, Beaverhead County; M. H. Parker~ Jv&je. AOTI0N, under Civil Code, Section 1891, by Clark MeNinch (substituted for Mattie Z Farrington), against C. E. Crawford, Mary McKnight, M. J. Martinell, M. Dowling and Stephen Cook. From the decree rendered, and from an order denying a new trial, defendants Dowling and Cook appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE: HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action wa~ commenced in the district court of Beaver-head county by Ma±tie Z. Fairington against several defendants *298to have determined the relative rights of the parties to the use of the waters of Sage creek. The answering defendants appeared and filed separate answers and cross-complaints- controverting the allegations- of the plaintiff’s- complaint, and every one setting forth his right-, and putting in issue the allegations of every other cross-complaint. The- cause was- tried without a jury. The court made findings of fact and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Osnes Livestock Co. v. WarrenMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Wills v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sloan v. ByersMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Bennett v. QuinlanMontana Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API