Junge v. MacKnight
Supreme Court of North Carolina
PetitioN to rehear this case, reported in 135 N. C., 105.
1DissentDouglas, J.
This case was heard at the last term of this Court, and fully considered.' In addition to the opinion of the Court, two opinions, one concurring and one dissenting, were carefully and ably written. Not a single point was overlooked that seems to me to have any material bearing upon the case. Therefore, under the repeated decisions of this Court the petition to rehear should be denied. *293In Watson v. Dodd, 72 N. C., 240, Chief Justice Pearson, speaking for tbe Court., says: “Tbe weightiest considerations make it tbe duty of tbe courts to adhere to their decisions. No case ought to be reversed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coley v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Watson v. . DoddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- McNeill v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Weisel v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Capehart v. . BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899