Brown Stribling v. Rankin
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Wilson, J., Walhalla, March, 1914. Action by William M. Brown and Wm. J. Stribling, as partners under the style and firm name of Brown & Stribling, plaintiffs, against John J. Rankin and C. R. Angel, defendants. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.
Read the full summary
Before Wilson, J., Walhalla, March, 1914. Action by William M. Brown and Wm. J. Stribling, as partners under the style and firm name of Brown & Stribling, plaintiffs, against John J. Rankin and C. R. Angel, defendants. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion. cites: 77 S. C. 420, 426. As to estoppel: 96 S. C. 120, 123; 11 Ency. 425. Charge prejudicial: 62 S. C. 17. submits: Plaintiffs estopped to deny that Richardson was purchaser and had title: 22 S. C. 550; Big. Estop. 434; 16 Cyc. 764. Record as notice: Civil Code 3542 and 3461; 31 S. C. 147;…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Watts.
This was an action by plaintiffs against the defendants for the wrongful and wilful taking possession of and selling and converting two mules, alleged to be-the property of the plaintiffs under a chattel mortgage made by C. E. Angel to the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs seek to recover possession of the mules or the alleged value thereof, $450.00, and for damages in the event a delivery cannot be had. Angel did not answer. The defendant, Rankin, by his answer interposes a general denial, and alleges that Angel did not purchase from plaintiffs…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bingham v. Harby & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Grafton v. PatrickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank of Norris v. Pates & Allen Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Brown v. RankinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917