Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Safeway, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 20, 2007No. 57468-0-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 A worker who is “acting in the course of employment” at the time of an injury is entitled to benefits under the Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), Title 51 RCW.1 Here, Charles E. Johnson was sitting at a lunch table in Safeway’s break room prior to starting his shift. He fell, injuring himself, when he got up from the table to get a glass of water. His activities at the time of his injury were neither at Safeway’s direction nor in furtherance of its business. Accordingly, we affirm the superior court’s summary dismissal of his claim.

Cox, J. —

¶2 Johnson began working at Safeway in 1999 as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hamilton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Remer v. ConradOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Melin-Schilling v. ImmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Johnson v. Safeway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Johnson v. Safeway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API