Legal Opinion
Watt v. Firestone
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 10, 1986No. BL-158PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Watt and Webster, petitioners, seek issuance of an extraordinary writ to compel-respondent Firestone to remove a proposed constitutional amendment from the November, 1986, general election ballot. Petitioners contend that the proposed amendment violates existing provisions of the state and federal constitutions. Because we disagree with these contentions, we deny the petition.
The amendment in question was proposed by Citizens for Jobs and Tourism, Inc. (Citizens). It would permit casino gambling in Florida in specific geographic locations approved in an initiative referendum by electors of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dade County Classroom Teachers Association, Inc. v. LegislatureSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hope for Families & Community Service, Inc. v. WarrenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010
- Gretna Racing, LLC v. Florida Department of Business And Professional Regulation, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
- Gretna Racing, LLC v. Department of Business & Professional RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Gretna Racing, LLC v. Florida Department of Business And Professional Regulation, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
- Gretna Racing, LLC v. Florida Department of Business And Professional Regulation, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.