Anthonique Pamphile v. State

Anthonique Pamphile appeals the denial of two motions for postconviction relief. We conclude that the trial court erred in summarily denying ground three of Pam-phile’s rule 3.850 motion, but otherwise affirm.

Following a jury trial, Pamphile was convicted of robbery with a firearm, aggra vated assault with a firearm, and third-degree grand theft. This court affirmed his convictions and sentences. Pamphile v. State, 113 So.3d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

In ground three of his rule 3,850 motion, Pamphile alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to object to improper prosecutorial…