Legal Opinion

Fitzwater v. Fassett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1901No. Appeal, No. 68PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 68, Jan. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Bradford County, Dec. T., 1899, No. 254, refusing to take off nonsuit, in case of Matt Fitzwater v. T. M. Fassett. Trespass to recover damages for loss of cattle. Before Dun-ham, P. J., specially presiding.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 68, Jan. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Bradford County, Dec. T., 1899, No. 254, refusing to take off nonsuit, in case of Matt Fitzwater v. T. M. Fassett. Trespass to recover damages for loss of cattle. Before Dun-ham, P. J., specially presiding. At the trial it appeared that plaintiff claimed to recover damages for the loss of four cows which had become infected with disease from a dead horse which the plaintiff’s landlord permitted a stranger to bury in the leased premises. The court entered a compulsory nonsuit which it subsequently refused to take off. Error…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

The appellee in this case was the owner of certain lands in Canton township, Bradford County, Pa.

These lands were leased to the appellant, Fitzwater, and in June, 1899, were used as pasturage for cattle.

At the request of a wandering stranger, on or about June 15, 1899, the appellee, Fassett, granted permission to bury in the pasture, a dead horse, which had died on an adjoining school house lot. The appellee had no part in the burial, and gave no directions concerning it, nor had he any knowledge, that the horse had any infectious disease. The horse was taken into…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Heitzman v. DivilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Streipe v. Liberty Mutual Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API