Legal Opinion

Palmer v. King

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 1, 1919No. 9483PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Haskell Comity; W. H. Brown, Judge. Action by Rachael King and others against N. W. Palmer and others. From judgment for plaintiffs defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Charlotte Winlock, a.full-blood Choctaw Indian woman, departed this life in what is now Haskell county, Okla., January 14, 1906, the owner of an allotment of land by virtue of her citizenship in said tribe, leaving surviving her Rufus Winlock, a paternal uncle, Martin Compeluhe, a paternal cousin, and Rachael King and other defendants in error, maternal cousins; all heirs, both paternal and maternal, being of Indian blood. In May, 1909, the paternal heirs deeded a portion of the lands allotted to the deceased, and from this deed the other parties plaintiffs in error derive their title.

In'…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sizemore v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Shulthis v. McDougalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Pigeon v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Brady v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Roberts v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Glory v. BagbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Ashcraft v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Larkin v. HiittenmeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Minshall v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Gentry v. BlinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API