Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Preston's Estate

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1937Published

1DissentLusk, J.

The question is whether the legacy in the third paragraph of the will is specific or demonstrative; that is to say, whether the testatrix intended the respondent, Byrne Marconnier, to have $5,000 only in the event that sufficient moneys for that purpose should be derived from the contract between the testatrix and her former husband, Charles Bliss Preston, or whether the gift was a general one, payable at all events, the proceeds of the contract being indicated only as a convenient source of payment.

Legacies are either general or specific. A general legacy is one which does not necessitate…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Tifft v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. In re Estate of WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Gardner v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API