Legal Opinion

Docherty v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1952No. Appeal, 69PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

On February 26, 1951, Clarence Doeherty, plaintiff, then a fireman for the City of Philadelphia, was served with charges of being absent without leave and disobedience of orders. On March 15, 1951, a hearing was held on these charges by the Civil Service Commission. That body entered an order on April 25, 1951, discharging him from the Bureau of Fire. Plaintiff then filed this complaint in mandamus-alleging that his discharge was in violation of the Act of June 25, 1919, P. L. 581, Art. XIX, §18, as amended. The learned court below entered judgment for the City and plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conroy v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Occhibone Appeal, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API