Legal Opinion

Burdunice v. State of Minnesota

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 23, 2020No. 0:20-cv-02215Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Lannon Lavar Burdunice, Case No. 20-cv-2215 (MJD/TNL) Petitioner, v. ORDER State of Minnesota, Respondent. Petitioner Lannon Lavar Burdunice requests leave to file a petition for a writ of coram nobis attacking the validity of a 2011 conviction for assault incurred in state court. See ECF No. 8. The motion is denied. Although the Court may in some circumstances consider a petition for a writ of coram nobis attacking the validity of a federal conviction, see Baranski v. United States,

880 F.3d 951, 954

(8th Cir. 2018), it lacks jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Korematsu v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
  2. Keith Baranski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  3. Rawlins v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API