Lane v. Skamania County

¶1 Lawrence and Shelane L’Hommedieu1 appeal pro se from the trial court’s denial of their CR 13(e) motion to supplement their pleadings. In January 2010, after trial, and after we issued a mandate terminating review of the underlying 2003 land use petition act (LUPA)2 case, the L’Hommedieus moved to add a counterclaim to that case alleging that Dennis and Elizabeth Lane wrongfully filed a lis pendens on the L’Hommedieus’ property in 2006. The *493L’Hommedieus argue that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motion to file a counterclaim in the 2003 case because (1) it erred in…