Legal Opinion

Magoon v. Gillett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Oerro Gordo Oi/remt Gov/rt. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtServers, J.

1. ATTCHMENT : amendment practice. This action was not founded on contract, and the petition asked that an attachment issue, whioh was done, and certain real and personal property attached. No allowance of the “amount in value of the property that may be attached” was made by a judge of the Supreme, District, or Circuit Court, as is required by section 2955 of the Code. For this reason a motion was made by the defendants to quash the attachment and discharge the property. Before this motion was submitted, the plaintiff filed a paper in which the property attached was de*55scribed and its value…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murdough v. McPherrinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  2. Gates v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  3. Shaffer v. SundwallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Sherrill v. FaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  5. Lowenstein v. MonroeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goodman v. HenryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. DoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Starkey v. LunzOregon Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API