Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Clendinning

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 15, 1966No. 41811PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

This matter is presented upon Petitioner’s application for this Court to assume original jurisdiction for issuance of a writ of prohibition. The special relief sought is an order enjoining the district court and respondent judge from proceeding further in Case No. 110,142, now pending in the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma. The matters which precipitated the application for extraordinary relief are summarized briefly hereafter.

On May 19, 1963, Petitioner, an adult resident of the State of Arkansas, was operating an automobile up on the streets of the City of Tulsa. He…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cowgill, Adm'r v. Boock, Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Schneider v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  5. Courtney v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hill v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Dorothy Faye Markham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Mauk v. MaukOhio Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API