Herridge v. State

*289ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing presents first his complaint that the verdict is contrary to the law as submitted in the charge, and against the facts. The court charged the jury as follows:

“If you believe from the evidence that the defendant and Winona Lewis were engaged to be married at the time of the act of carnal intercourse between thenj, if any, but that the said Winona Lewis was not induced to have carnal intercourse with the defendant by reason of such engagement alone, if any, but that she submitted to him, if she did, relying wholly or in •…