State v. Jones
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
David Jones ("Jones") was granted post-conviction relief in Madison Superior Court. The State appeals, presenting the following dispositive issues for review:
I. Whether a jury instruction created a mandatory presumption entitling Jones to post-conviction relief; and
II. Whether Jones' sentencing enhancements are subject to the double enhancement prohibition of Ross v. State.
Concluding the jury instruction at issue does not entitle Jones to post-conviction relief and Jones' sentencing enhancements are not subject to Ross, we reverse and remand.
Facts and Procedural History
On…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robbins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- James Q. Bryant v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013