Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2004No. 48A02-0308-PC-723PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

David Jones ("Jones") was granted post-conviction relief in Madison Superior Court. The State appeals, presenting the following dispositive issues for review:

I. Whether a jury instruction created a mandatory presumption entitling Jones to post-conviction relief; and

II. Whether Jones' sentencing enhancements are subject to the double enhancement prohibition of Ross v. State.

Concluding the jury instruction at issue does not entitle Jones to post-conviction relief and Jones' sentencing enhancements are not subject to Ross, we reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

On…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robbins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. James Q. Bryant v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API