Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Chicago Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 26, 2007No. 4D06-1255PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing
2Per curiam
We grant appellee’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion, and substitute the following in its place.
A medical doctor sued his professional liability insurer for failing to exercise good faith in settling a claim against him. He claimed that his insurance company failed to undertake the necessary investigation pursuant to section 766.106, Florida Statutes, and settled a claim which was completely defensible, causing him damages, including the insurance company’s subsequent refusal to renew his policy. The trial court dismissed the claim, finding that neither…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- State v. GoodeSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Wakulla County v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Shuster v. South Broward Hosp. Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Freeman v. CohenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- American Southern Insurance Company v. Gulf Coast Transportation, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Simon v. Proassurance Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Simon v. Proassurance Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012