Legal Opinion

Ali v. Howard

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 16, 2009No. 09-1654PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*668OPINION

2Per curiam

Robert Saunders (a/k/a Shamsidin Ali), a Delaware state inmate, appeals pro se from orders by the District Court granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Because the appeal is lacking in arguable legal merit, we will dismiss it under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

I

Before reviewing the District Court’s orders, we must first address appellees’ motion to vacate this Court’s order granting Ali in forma pauperis status. Appellees move to revoke Ali’s in forma pauperis status by arguing that he has three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). In turn, this Court directed appellees to…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by41 opinions

  1. Watson v. Department of Services for Children, Youths & Their Families DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
  2. Stones v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
  3. Monroe v. BryanDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  4. Abraham v. CostelloDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  5. Bethea v. DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API