State v. . Surles
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was indicted in Harnett County under section 1089 of The Code for disposing of mortgaged property; and at August Term, 1893, of the Superior Court of Harnett, the case was removed to the county of Johnston for trial. When the case was called the defendant moved to quash, upon the following grounds: (1) That the counts in the bill of indictment were repugnant; (2) that the description of the land in the mortgage and bill was insufficient; (3) that the transcript of the order of removal was insufficient. Upon the motion being denied by the court, the defendant excepted. There were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. . ParishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Goodman v. . SappSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- State v. TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. . WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- State v. CratonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harris v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Christmon v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- State v. FrenchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- In re SteeleDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1954
- Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.