Barnett v. City of San Jose
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID BARNETT, et al., Case No. 18-cv-01383-JD 8 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS OF FACT AND 9 v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 10 CITY OF SAN JOSE, Defendant. 11 12 13 Plaintiffs are firefighters employed by defendant City of San Jose (City). They sued the 14 City for unpaid overtime they allege the City owes them under the Fair Labor Standards Act 15 (FLSA),
Pub. L. No. 75-718, 52
Stat. 1060 (1938) (codified as amended at
29 U.S.C. §§ 201
et 16 seq.). See generally Dkt. No. 46 (SAC). In a nutshell, the FLSA establishes, among other things, 17…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.