Legal Opinion

Barnett v. City of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 31, 2025No. 3:18-cv-01383Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID BARNETT, et al., Case No. 18-cv-01383-JD 8 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS OF FACT AND 9 v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 10 CITY OF SAN JOSE, Defendant. 11 12 13 Plaintiffs are firefighters employed by defendant City of San Jose (City). They sued the 14 City for unpaid overtime they allege the City owes them under the Fair Labor Standards Act 15 (FLSA),

Pub. L. No. 75-718, 52

Stat. 1060 (1938) (codified as amended at

29 U.S.C. §§ 201

et 16 seq.). See generally Dkt. No. 46 (SAC). In a nutshell, the FLSA establishes, among other things, 17…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API