Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1924No. 1557. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The plaintiff in error, McFarland, sued defendant in error, Martin, to recover a commission alleged to have been earned by him by the sale of certain land which had been ,listed for sale with him by Martin. It was alleged by plaintiff that on or about January 21, 1920, he effected a sale to E. B. Propst of Charlotte, N. C., notwithstanding which Martin sold the land to other parties on February 2, 1920.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, a peremptory charge was given in favor of the defendant in error, who offered no evidence. Judgment was rendered accordingly.

In the absence of an exclusive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. PikeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Duval v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Irwin v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walker v. Van ValkenbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Higdon v. ChannellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Hughey v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API