Smith v. Walker
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
1. There can be no valid foreclosure of a materialman’s lien for material furnished to a contractor and used in improving the real estate of another person against which the lien is claimed, in the absence of a judgment in favor of the materialman against the contractor for the price or value of such material; and it must also appear, among other things, that suit for recovery of such judgment against the contractor- was commenced within twelve months from the time the claim became due. Code, §§ 67-2001, 67-2002; Pike Brothers Lumber Co. v. Mitchell, 132 Ga. 675 (64 S. E. 998,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pike Bros. Lumber Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Realty Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Griffin Bros. v. Gainesville Iron WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Kwilecki v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Usry v. Hines-Yelton Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cowart v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Adair Mortgage Co. v. Allied Concrete Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Ayers v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Liggett v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979