Hudson v. Bank of Pine Bluff
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Jefferson Chancery Court. John M. Eeliott, Judge. The Bank o’f Pine Bluff, holding 210 shares of the Park View Land Company in pledge to secure a promissory note for $2,000 executed to it by the firm of Rosenberg & Miller,.with-' out any transfer of same on the books of the land company, brought suit against the land company and certain execution creditors of Rosenberg & Miller, and E. M. Hudson, trustee for such, creditors, alleging that the creditors had…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jefferson Chancery Court. John M. Eeliott, Judge. The Bank o’f Pine Bluff, holding 210 shares of the Park View Land Company in pledge to secure a promissory note for $2,000 executed to it by the firm of Rosenberg & Miller,.with-' out any transfer of same on the books of the land company, brought suit against the land company and certain execution creditors of Rosenberg & Miller, and E. M. Hudson, trustee for such, creditors, alleging that the creditors had procured execution's to be levied upon said 210 shares in the land company owned by Rosenberg & Miller, had caused the shares…
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
First. It is contended that the suit must fail because the Park View Land Company was not a party.
The Park View Land Company was a party to the suit. It is named as one of the parties defendant in the caption to the complaint. Again, in the body of the complaint it is alleged: “That as collateral security to the said indebtedness F. M. Rosenberg, a member of said firm, who was the owner and holder of shares of stock of the Park View Land Company, one of the defendants herein,” etc. Again, in the prayer of the complaint it is asked that “all equity of the said defendants, F. M. Rosenberg, Park…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Batesville Telephone Co. v. Myer-Schmidt Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stroud v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929