Legal Opinion
Morman v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 1, 1984No. 84-331PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
458 So.2d 88 (1984)
Sylvester MORMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-331.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
November 1, 1984.
Sylvester Morman, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
SHARP, Judge.
We affirm the trial court's denial of Morman's motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 because the result is correct, although the basis given for the denial is erroneous. Morman's pro se rule 3.850 motion alleged he was convicted of robbery (Count I) and also of being an accessory after the fact of the same robbery (Count II). He…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Van Bever v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. SykesSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Staten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Collins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Staten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992