Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Andrus v. LOCAL 69, METAL POLISHERS, BUFFERS, PLATERS & HELPERS

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1961No. Docket 9, Calendar 48,191Published

1ConcurrenceBlack, J.

(concurring), I concur. Unless, as recently urged here, “it is enough that challenge to jurisdiction over the subject matter need merely be suggested on the record to impose upon a court the duty of conducting inquiry as to its jurisdiction to proceed” (Haenlein v. Saginaw Building Trades Council, A. F. L., 361 Mich 263, 276), the appeal of the defendant labor union should be dismissed for want of submission to this Court, in conformity with 1959-amended section 6 of Court Rule No 67 (355 Mich xiv), of essential proof supporting the union’s plea to the jurisdiction.

The defendant union’s naked…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peoples Savings Bank v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Peoples Savings Bank v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Haenlein v. Saginaw Building Trades CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API