Andrus v. LOCAL 69, METAL POLISHERS, BUFFERS, PLATERS & HELPERS
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceBlack, J.
(concurring), I concur. Unless, as recently urged here, “it is enough that challenge to jurisdiction over the subject matter need merely be suggested on the record to impose upon a court the duty of conducting inquiry as to its jurisdiction to proceed” (Haenlein v. Saginaw Building Trades Council, A. F. L., 361 Mich 263, 276), the appeal of the defendant labor union should be dismissed for want of submission to this Court, in conformity with 1959-amended section 6 of Court Rule No 67 (355 Mich xiv), of essential proof supporting the union’s plea to the jurisdiction.
The defendant union’s naked…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peoples Savings Bank v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Peoples Savings Bank v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Haenlein v. Saginaw Building Trades CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1960