Legal Opinion

School Committee v. Coelho

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 16, 1998No. 96-P-189PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

On June 18, 1993, the Governor signed into law the Education Reform Act of 1993, St. 1993, c. 71 (Act). Among other things, the Act substantially rewrote G. L. c. 71, § 42, and established an exclusive arbitration procedure under the auspices of the Commissioner of Education (commissioner) for those teachers terminated for “just cause.” G. L. c. 71, § 42, as amended by St. 1993, c. 71, § 44.2

*615The defendants, Marcel Marchand and Anthony Coelho (teachers), requested that the commissioner commence arbitration proceedings pursuant to G. L. c. 71, § 42, as amended by St. 1993, c. 71, § 44,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boston Teachers Union v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Higher Education Coordinating Council v. Massachusetts Teachers' Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Milne v. School Committee of ManchesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Turner v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lyons v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Ballotte v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Serrazina v. Springfield Public SchoolsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  4. Ballotte v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
  5. Gimas v. BialyMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API