Legal Opinion

Amazon.com Inc v. Wong

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 12, 2022No. 2:19-cv-00990Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 AMAZON.COM, INC., et al., CASE NO. C19-0990JLR 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S 12 FEES CHUN WONG, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Plaintiffs Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) and Nite Ize, Inc.’s 17 (“Nite Ize”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion for attorney’s fees. (Mot. (Dkt. # 67).) 18 Defendant Chun Wong has not submitted a response to Plaintiffs’ motion (see generally 19 Dkt.), but his counsel represents that he has “no information with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Scott Fischer v. sjb-p.d. Inc., a California Corporation, Dba Cedar Creek Inn Svenja Bienlefeld Michael ViliunasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Juan Manuel Morales v. City of San Rafael and Daniel HulettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Wildearth Guardians v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API