Legal Opinion

Clark v. Nessler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 12, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas <3. Windes, judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1893.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court,

Gary, P. J.

Samuel C. Hessler and Charles H. Leach were partners as real estate brokers, and this suit for commissions seems to be prosecuted by the latter in the name of both, adverse to the inclination of Hessler.

The insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, as well as error upon the instructions, was assigned as a reason in the motion made for a new trial, and the denial of that motion is assigned as error.

We’need only consider the evidence.

Leach is the only witness upon whose testimony the claim for commissions is based, and his version as to his own part…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carlson v. NathanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  2. Biddison v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  3. Day v. HaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farmer v. HolmesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API