Legal Opinion

CAROLINA PHOTOGRAPHY, INC. v. Hinton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 2009No. COA08-609PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Under the Sales and Use Tax Act, revenue derived from the “sales price” of tangible personal property is taxable income. 1 In this matter, the Secretary of Revenue argues that the trial court erred by ruling that “sitting fees” charged by Carolina Photography on photographs ultimately sold to high school seniors did not constitute taxable income. Because Carolina Photography’s “sitting fees” are charges for fabrication labor of printed photographs, we hold that the “sitting fees” constitute taxable income and therefore reverse the trial court’s ruling.

Carolina Photography engaged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. National Service Industries, Inc. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Young Roofing Co. v. North Carolina Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. N.C. Dep't of Revenue v. First Petroleum Servs., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2018
  2. N.C. Dep't of Revenue v. Graybar Elec. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  3. N.C. Dep't of Revenue v. Graybar Elec. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  4. N.C. Dep't of Revenue v. Graybar Elec. Co., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API