Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Hughes Developers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 6, 2003No. 1002059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Mays E. Montgomery, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding that Montgomery could not recover from the defendant corporation, Hughes Developers, Inc. ("Hughes"), for its issuance of a spurious stock certificate, which Montgomery took as collateral to secure a personal loan he made to the president of Hughes Developers. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I. Facts

On May 20, 1991, Mays E. Montgomery lent Morris W. Frank $100,000; to secure that loan Frank executed a promissory note, which contained a notation stating that "(5%) 50 shares of Hughes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York & New Haven Railroad v. SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Havens v. Bank of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Howe v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Randle v. WalkerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Crawford v. Twin City Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hughes Developers, Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Hughes Developers, Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API