Legal Opinion
MacRovision Corp. v. Dwight Cavendish Developments Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 29, 2000No. C 99-20011 EAIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OF U.S. PATENT NUMBER 5,633,927
INFANTE, United States Magistrate Judge. *
I. INTRODUCTION
In the present suit, Plaintiff Macrovision Corp. (“Macrovision”) has asserted U.S. Patent No. 5,633,927 (“the ’927 patent”) against Defendant Dwight Cavendish Developments, Inc. (“Dwight Cavendish”). The parties did not agree upon the scope of the patent claims, requiring the court to interpret the disputed claims. See Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967, 979 (Fed.Cir.1995)(en banc), aff'd, 517 U.S. 370, 116…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Transamerica Life Insurance v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008