Legal Opinion

Vogler v. Stark

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1907No. 14,908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Osborne district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.

1Per curiam

While the record is not in good form, and contains superfluous matter, it is not invalid.

The tax deed involved has been of record more than five years and is not open to attack for mere irregularities. The claim that the deed is void on its face because the consideration named is excessive is not good. It is largely based on a computation of interest at a rate of fifteen per cent., whereas the sale was made under a statute allowing a charge of twenty-four per cent., and the rate on such sale was not affected by the subsequent statute providing for a lower rate. (Gen. Stat. 1901, § 7698;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watkins v. IngeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. Kennedy v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Robbins v. BrowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Martin v. GarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. John v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kessler v. PolkoskySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Lyle v. RaynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Porter v. BeatySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API