Legal Opinion

Ramkhalawan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 26, 2011No. 4D09-4765PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals a circuit court order summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 for lack of a valid oath. This was error because the unnotarized oath did comport with the requirements of rule 3.850 and the model form of rule 3.987, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure.

The trial court did not consider appellant’s five claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on their merit. We find that ground four, ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failure to object to and preserve for appeal the issue of the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. S & I Investments v. Payless Flea Market, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ramkhelawan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API