Legal Opinion
Paikoff v. Harris
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided August 31, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marc Finkelstein, J.
In this holdover proceeding, the motion and cross motion sub judice present claims under or related to the Martin Act, General Business Law § 352-eeee, that involve overlapping issues not frequently encountered in Housing Court; some not ever having been addressed directly by any court. Further, the landlord-tenant relationship between petitioner and respondents1 has been marked by a variety of civil and criminal charges and proceedings which yield little by way of clarification of these Martin Act issues.
An examination of the petition and answer is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MSG Pomp Corp. v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Giannini v. StuartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- 38 Holding Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Kessel v. D'AmatoNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Kessel v. D'AmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re SteinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Geiser v. MaranAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001
- Mayfair York L. L. C. v. ZimmermanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999
- Parkchester Preservation Co. v. HanksCivil Court of the City of New York · 2000