Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Kurtz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 7, 1921No. 9850Published

Proceeding involving the validity of á decree for permanent alimony. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of Pueblo County, Hon. Samuel D. Trimble, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Suit was by Maty Kurtz against her husband, G. Kurtz, for divorce. Verdict was in her favor. The court awarded her an interlocutory decree and custody of the minor children. When the formal divorce decree was entered the court failed to embody therein either a provision for permanent alimony, or a formal reservation of that question. Thereafter, of its own motion, the court entered a nunc pro tunc order, specifically reserving the matter of the adjustment of property rights between the parties, and lafer allowed permanent alimony. Defendant alleges error, and brings the cause here for review…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  2. DeGuile v. AlexanderColorado Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API