Legal Opinion

(PC) Cunningham v. Bird

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 2, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00306Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 RAYSHUN CUNNINGHAM, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00306-JLT-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 13 v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE 14 BIRD, et al., ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) 15 Defendants. ) (ECF No. 1) ) 16 ) ) 17 18 Plaintiff Rayshun Cunningham is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint filed March 26, 2022. 21 I. 22 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 23 The Court is required to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API