James Greenway v. Information Dynamics, Ltd., Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentEugene A. Wright, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent because I believe that the activities of the appellant Information Dynamics, Ltd. (IDL) do not fall within the purview of the statute.
Information about a consumer’s bad check-writing habits does concededly “bear on” his “character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living.” [15 U.S.C. § 1681a(d).] But a check drawn on a commercial bank is tantamount to cash. It is a “commercial device intended for use as a temporary expedient for actual money, and generally designed for immediate payment, and not for circulation.” Black’s Law Dictionary 301 (4th…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fite v. Retail Credit CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1975
- Sizemore v. Bambi Leasing CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
- Porter v. Talbot Perkins Children's ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- State v. PerrigoueWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Wrigley v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.