Legal Opinion

PURDY v. KIJAKAZI

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02048Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMEL L. PURDY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting : NO. 22-2048 Commissioner of Social Security : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ELIZABETH T. HEY, U.S.M.J. October 11, 2023 Jamel L. Purdy (“Plaintiff”) seeks review of the Commissioner’s decision denying his applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”). For the reasons that follow, I conclude that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) is supported by substantial evidence. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API