Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Shulsky

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 15, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.

The decedent left him surviving his wife and three minor children. By his last will and testament, after a direction as to the payment of his debts, etc., and a legacy of $500 to a sister, he bequeathed his household furniture and effects and his automobile to his wife.. He also devised certain real estate to her, directed his executors “ to pay all encumbrances existing against ” the same and stated that it was his intention to devise said property to her “ free and clear of all encumbrances.” One-half of the residue he gave, devised and bequeathed to his executors and trustees in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roe v. . VingutNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Robinson v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Matter of HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Thurber v. . ChambersNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Starr v. . StarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Will of JergeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  2. In re the Construction of the Will of CromwellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  3. In re the Estate of KnappNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API