Legal Opinion

Chattanooga & Tennessee River Power Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1913No. 2,355PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Eastern District of Tennessee. Criminal prosecution by the United States against the Chattanooga & Tennessee River Power Company. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The power company, plaintiff in error, was convicted of violating the act which restricts the daily .service of laborers and mechanics employed upon the public works of the United States to eight hours. Act August 1, 1892, c. 352, 27 Stat. 340 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2521). The power company demurred to the indictment on the ground that it shows bn its face that the work in question is not “a public work of the United States,” within the meaning of the act alluded to. The demurrer was overruled, the company found guilty and a fine imposed; and error is prosecuted.

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Fox v. CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co. v. Patten Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chattanooga & Tennessee River Power Co. v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Peterson v. United States Ex Rel. Marsh Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API