Legal Opinion

Tirumali v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 2000No. LUBA 2000-005; LUBA 2000-007; LUBA 2000-018; CA A110016PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, P. J.

Petitioners filed separate appeals to LUBA from the City of Portland’s issuance of a residential building permit, and a revised permit to respondents Gaeth and Orcutt, as well as an explanatory letter from the City’s planning director concerning the permits. Petitioners contended, inter alia, that the city erred by allowing respondents to use an artificial, earth-filled “finished grade,” rather than the “original grade” of the sloping property, in fixing the “base point” for measuring the height of respondents’ building. Consequently, according to petitioners, the height of the building will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John v. Yachats Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Byrnes v. City of HillsboroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Roberts v. City of Cannon Beach (A184314)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Roberts v. City of Cannon Beach (A184314)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Stop Dump Coalition v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Hardtla v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API