Legal Opinion
Hi-Lo Auto Supply, L.P. v. Beresky
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided February 25, 1999No. 09-98-342CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RONALD L. WALKER, Chief Justice.
On behalf of a putative class, Charles Beresky sued Hi-Lo Auto Supply, L.P., for deceptive trade practices, breach of contract, negligence, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation, alleging Hi-Lo sold “old” and “used” automotive batteries as “new” batteries. Beresky alleges Hi-Lo developed a scheme to promote, offer, and sell as new automotive batteries that were old, used, or out of manufacturer’s warranty. The trial court signed a proposed class certification order, and Hi-Lo appealed. Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(3) (Vernon Supp.1999).…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- General Motors Corp. v. BloyedTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Weatherly v. Deloitte & Touche, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
- Microsoft Corp. v. Manning, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Fry, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- TCI Cablevision of Dallas, Inc. v. Owens, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. Stromboe, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.