Legal Opinion

People v. Tanser

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 23, 1979No. 78-30PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

The State appeals from an order suppressing the defendant’s confession. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 110A, par. 604(a).) In issue is whether the confession was voluntary or, rather, involuntary as the result of inducements of confidentiality by the police, or inadequate Miranda warnings.

Defendant was arrested on a charge of arson (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 20—1) involving the residence of his neighbor, Francis Palmatier. After a hearing, the court granted the defendant’s motion to suppress his confession on the basis of his finding that Tanser had not been adequately informed of and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. The PEOPLE v. HesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. The People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. NoeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. People v. MacFarlandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. EatherlyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. People v. ArkebauerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. People v. HornsbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API