Legal Opinion

National City Bank v. Gelfert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order modified by striking therefrom all of its directory provisions and by providing in lieu thereof that plaintiff’s motion be granted to the extent of confirming the referee’s report of sale except as to deficiency and otherwise denied, and that the cross-motion of the defendant-executor be denied, and, as so modified, the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Judgment entered pursuant to said order vacated.

Plaintiff did not make an application for a deficiency judgment, as provided by section 1083 of the Civil .Practice Act. Said defendant’s cross-motion for an order fixing the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. National City Bank v. GelfertNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. White v. WielandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Primary Realty Corp. v. LibrettNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  5. White v. Wielandt, New York County Courts1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API