Legal Opinion

Ozark Production Credit Ass'n v. Walden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 1985No. 13802PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

At issue here is whether, following a foreclosure sale, the trustee of a deed of trust properly included as a part of the balance due on a note, $15,702.06 for the beneficiary’s attorney’s fees, and whether the trustee should receive a fee for the sale.

Garnishee Sac River Valley Bank held a promissory note, the payment of which was secured by a deed of trust on a farm owned by defendants. Garnishee Johnson was the trustee on the bank’s deed of trust. Plaintiff held a note secured by a second deed of trust on the farm. At the bank’s request Johnson foreclosed its deed of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. GrishamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Condict v. FlowerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Emmons v. WintersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Stark v. LoveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Washington University v. Royal Crown Bottling Co. of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. American Bank of Princeton v. StilesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Union Center Redevelopment Corp. v. LeslieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Howard Construction Co. v. Teddy Woods Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Roark Motor Lodge Interval Sales Corp. v. LindnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API