Peters v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, Circuit Judge.
The complainant brought a bill in equity in the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts against the defendant, alleging: That he held a so-called * ‘semi tontine” insurance policy in the latter. That he was entitled to a share in the accumulations of the tontine fund, for which the defendant refused to account, offering him only a part of that to which he was entitled. That the defendant agreed with the complainant to apportion the surplus equitably; to keep an accurate account of dividends accruing; to produce upon demand an account showing the complainant’s interest in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cates v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pierce v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Hallett v. CumstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Mathews Slate Co. v. MathewsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1906
- Fenno v. PrimroseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Mabray v. Union Pac. R. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1933
- INVESTORS'GUARANTY CORPORATION v. LuikartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- City of Knoxville v. Southern Paving Const. Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1914
- United States v. BoylenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.