Legal Opinion
Nomm v. Nomm
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1958No. Civ. 17998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. CLAIR, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from an order pendente lite in a divorce action.
The order in question, issued after a hearing on an order to show cause, read, in part: “Wherefore, It Is Hereby Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the defendant be and he is hereby restrained and enjoined from entering the dwelling house of the parties hereto at 232 Twenty Seventh Avenue, San Mateo, California from and after 5:00 0 ’clock p. m. of Friday, September 13,1957 and until the further order of this court. ’ ’
The action came to trial and an interlocutory decree was entered on March 4, 1958,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Food & Grocery Bureau v. GarfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gray v. BybeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Piru Citrus Assn. v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mangum v. Maryland State Board of CensorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- MacKie v. MacKieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Fuller v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Mackie v. MackieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Marriage of Mandt CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015